{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"European Scientist","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/fr\/","author_name":"European Scientist","author_url":"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/fr\/author\/eseditor1\/","title":"Une nouvelle querelle sur la transparence de l\u2019AEPC","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bpjDV0kvic\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/fr\/sante\/une-nouvelle-querelle-sur-la-transparence-de-laepc\/\">Une nouvelle querelle sur la transparence de l\u2019AEPC<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/fr\/sante\/une-nouvelle-querelle-sur-la-transparence-de-laepc\/embed\/#?secret=bpjDV0kvic\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0Une nouvelle querelle sur la transparence de l\u2019AEPC\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; European Scientist\" data-secret=\"bpjDV0kvic\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/url-19.jpg","thumbnail_width":540,"thumbnail_height":333,"description":"L&rsquo;Agence europ\u00e9enne des produits chimiques est au c\u0153ur d\u2019une nouvelle controverse sur sa transparence \u2013 elle est accus\u00e9e d\u2019\u00eatre \u00e0 la botte de l\u2019industrie pharmaceutique. La transparence est un \u00e9l\u00e9ment crucial dans l\u2019\u00e9valuation de m\u00e9dicaments et de produits chimiques en Europe. Le r\u00e8glement enregistrement, \u00e9valuation et autorisation des produits chimiques (REACH) a ainsi mis en [&hellip;]"}