{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"European Scientist","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/fr\/","author_name":"Jean-Philippe Vuillez","author_url":"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/fr\/author\/jean-philippe-vuillez\/","title":"Science : m\u00e9fions-nous des abus de consensus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UnXgh0SPJN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/fr\/opinion\/science-mefions-nous-des-abus-de-consensus\/\">Science : m\u00e9fions-nous des abus de consensus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/fr\/opinion\/science-mefions-nous-des-abus-de-consensus\/embed\/#?secret=UnXgh0SPJN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0Science : m\u00e9fions-nous des abus de consensus\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; European Scientist\" data-secret=\"UnXgh0SPJN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.europeanscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Unknown.jpeg","thumbnail_width":1168,"thumbnail_height":784,"description":"Peut-on assimiler un \u00ab\u00a0consensus\u00a0\u00bb, qualifi\u00e9, ou pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 comme, \u00ab\u00a0scientifique\u00a0\u00bb, \u00e0 une v\u00e9rit\u00e9 scientifique\u00a0? Dans bien des domaines et d\u00e9bats actuels (que nous \u00e9viterons d\u2019\u00e9voquer, chacun pourra se trouver des exemples), il semble que ce soit le cas. Il est devenu habituel de mettre en avant un \u00ab\u00a0consensus\u00a0\u00bb pour conforter ou imposer une pr\u00e9tendue v\u00e9rit\u00e9, ou [&hellip;]"}